Liver function tests (LFTs) are used to aid in determining if there may be a problem with an individuals liver, they test for things that are associated with liver function e.g. billirubin
the Fife LFT panel: Alb, ALT, ALP, Bil test for those only, however you can request for more tests e.g. Available separately: ygT, AST.
Alb (Albumin)
Pros
Main plasma protein
produced by liver
used as an assessment of liver synthetic function
ALT & AST
Pros
Cytoplasmic enzymes which are sensitive markers of acute damage to hepatocytes.
ALP (Alkaline phosphate)
Pros
Used to look for biliary epithelial damage & obstruction • increased in liver disease due to increased synthesis in response to cholestasis
ygT
Pros
Also used to look for biliary epithelial damage & obstruction. • “Super”-sensitive!
Billirubin
Pros
Breakdown product of haemoglobin: Unconjugated bilirubin taken up by liver & conjugated then excreted in bile. • Raised bilirubin results in clinical jaundice. • Used as an indicator of cholestasis.
overall LFT
Pros
Advantages -cheap, widely available, interpretable -direct subsequent investigation (e.g. imaging)
Cons
low albumin is normally found in some conditions, such as Post OP (due to redistribution)
significant malnutrition
nephrotic syndrome
Cons
Non-specific: found in cardiac muscle & erythrocytes as well as the liver • Also raised in e.g. – skeletal muscle disorders, – MI
Cons
ALP isoenzymes also present in bone, gut & placenta. • Raised in – physiological states e.g., pregnancy, childhood – bone is broken or in some bony diseases. – Induced by some drugs
Cons
Also present in bone, biliary tract, pancreas & kidney. • Affected by ingestion of alcohol and drugs such as phenytoin • May be over-sensitive?
Cons
Also raised in: – haemolysis – Hereditary hyperbilirubinaemias e.g. Gilbert’s syndrome.
Cons
Disadvantages – Do not assess liver “function” – Lack of complete organ specificity – Lack of disease specificity – May be “over-sensitive” – >40 years old, many newly discovered diseases for which they have no diagnostic value
pros and cons above, they are useful tests but often not nearly specific enough, plus there are so many new diseases out now that these tests are N/A for

good clinical history is paramount as we require it to allow us to know what to explore next
also rem the golf ball toxicity licking story